Internet
Branding
Through the
Loop covered the Third Age of Internet in a previous MarketLoop.
When the Internet entered its Second Age, many claimed that it
was not a viable brand-building medium. However, the benefit of
experience has shown that branding is absolutely crucial to Internet
success, arguably more so than in the off-line world. Through
the Loop has identified and analysed success factors for Internet
branding based on a long-term view of development.
What is really
happening?
A quick glance
through the press may give the indication that the Internet is
a failing medium. The stories about how much shares soared of
the first day of trading have been replaced by coverage about
high profile dotcom failures. Letsbuyit.com has been rescued from
bankruptcy, e-commerce sales may not have reached expectations
and boo.com was all over the press. Suddenly, venture capitalists
do not appear to be rushing to invest in the latest dotcom business
plan. So forget the hype and understand what this really means.
It has become
clear that Internet businesses do not have way of working that
make them immune to standard rules of business. Like any organisation,
the business model has to be not only viable but also sustainable.
There is a
shake-out and this has helped us to identify best practices for
succeeding in Internet branding. Distinct marketing methods are
vital. While these lessons have been distilled from long-running
analysis of Internet branding, they are not so different from
straightforward rules of branding. This indicates that while unlearning
and starting with an open-mind are vital, basic marketing
conventions also apply to a large extent.
Brand identity
must be clear.
Innovation has to be continually demonstrated.
Differentiation is absolutely vital.
The consumer is in control.
logo design identity must
be clear
Branding helps
the Internet business to stand out from the crowd. Those companies
that are most successful have a clear and concise logo design.
They may provide what appears to be a commodity service but the
strength of their branding means that they have become the defining
operator in the sector. Examples here include amazon.com which
is setting standards in book retailing although it may not have
been the pioneer and sells essentially the same items as other
internet-based retailers.
Yahoo! is
the defining search engine although it may not have been the first
and may not be the most effective. It does, however, have possibly
the strongest logo design and, like amazon.com, this has enabled
it to extend into new areas both geographically but also in terms
of products and services. It is also interesting to note that
while boo.com was a high profile failure, it has been relaunched
by its new owners with the same name. This highlights the high
level of brand awareness that had already been generated.
Other logo
designs have been developed much quicker on-line than they
may have evolved in the off-line world. Companies that have focused
on a clear branding strategy have defined the category in which
they operate and they may even own that category.
It becomes very difficult for a competitor to attain the same
level of awareness. Examples here are Motley Fool for investment
advice, Expedia for travel and lastminute.com for late ticket
offers.
Branding plays
a slightly different role on-line to that in the off-line world.
There is less of physical presence such as stores or packaging
design and so the logo design has to provide guides
to help differentiate the offering. The brand name may or may
not be the same as the domain name and, in any case, they have
to be able to differentiate the site from other domain names and
branding used on-line without having the help of physical differentiators.
Branding can
also include the provision of content to help add value to the
offering. One of amazon.coms strengths is the depth of its
reader reviews while Yahoo! categorises the sites listed thus
providing a helpful filter. Content richness and relevance will
be key in the future.
Generic or
category names are difficult to develop as brands in the same
way that they would be off-line. It is also important to consider
whether the same logo design
should be used for on-line and off-line presence. There are arguments
both ways.
Innovation
has to be continually demonstrated
The previous
BrandLoop argued that innovation is a continuous process and that
products and services should be constantly updated to survive
in the hyper-competitive market-place. On-line this is all the
more apparent as the nature of the medium can make it very easy
to copy a good idea. Therefore, a major opportunity can become
diluted very quickly. Consider the plethora of new intermediaries
such as reverse auctions or price comparison sites.
The amazon.com
and Yahoo! examples show how they have built-in rapid evolution
to keep them ahead of the competition. This includes the development
of local country versions proving that the Internet is an equally
local as global medium as well as improved personalisation and
service offerings.
In addition,
the medium and its associated delivery channels are evolving rapidly
and so on-line communications needs to be dynamic not just to
keep up-to-date but also to take advantage of any opportunities
offered.
Differentiation
is absolutely vital
It is important
to offer something different. This may be obvious but differentiation
has to be dynamic and sustained in an environment when an innovation
can be quickly copied and on a global scale. Retailers may be
selling from the same catalogue so incentives must be given to
encourage the consumer to visit. This could include adding value
through additional content but it is clear that price and product
range are not differentiating elements of a companys overall
offer. Customer service and delivery are going to become areas
where e-commerce will thrive or struggle. On-line communications
are essentially individual messages quite different from the broadcast
media of the past. Thus the extent to which communication are
personalised and made relevant to the individual are crucial.
Personalisation helps a marketer to offer unrivalled customer
service and, moreover, it makes the service easier to use.
The consumer
is in control
A successful
on-line campaign will recognise the fact that different channels
are used in different ways and that different types of messages
can be sent to different types of access devices. In addition,
there are two key elements of on-line marketing that are almost
unknown in the off-line world:
Two-way communications
are normal.
The consumer
is in control.
The consumer
communicates with the marketer in a form of dialogue rather than
listening to or viewing a marketers monologue. This could
be in the form of interacting with databases that capture details
of purchases and other behaviour.
There has
been much discussion about on-line marketing issues such as the
click-through rate. However, this fails to recognise the fact
that on-line communications are consumer-driven and are not led
by the marketer. The consumer tends to be looking for something
in particular and so mass marketing techniques are not appropriate.
Consequently, they may only click when they have finished their
task or on a later occasion. Consumers will choose if and when
they wish to visit a marketers Web site.
Intrusive
Internet communications such as pop-up advertising and windows
may be viewed as attempting to push messages to consumers in a
non-push environment. This does not mean that they have no role
but they should not be used and evaluated in the same way. On-line
marketing has to address the opportunities that the medium offers
and build communications around this rather than simply transferring
off-line communications.
Implications
The Internet
has been marked by excessive hype as well as scare stories. This
is not the sign of a medium in trouble, rather more it is evidence
of the fast pace of development and the fact that Internet marketing
is radically different from traditional marketing. Quite simply,
it is more difficult to achieve results in a hyper-competitive
and rapidly evolving sector. However, basic branding conventions
still apply.
The Internet
business model must be sustainable. There will be much more shake-out
in the sector but simply setting up a Web site, however good it
is, is no guarantee of success. The business model will have to
adhere to general business and marketing rules as well as take
into account issues that are specific to the Internet.
Action points
Is logo design
clear? How do on-line and off-line branding relate to each other?
Is innovation built-in and demonstrated? It is absolutely essential
to stay one-step ahead of potential competitors.
How is the site differentiated from similar operations? Is it
possible to be closer to the consumer through a high level of
personalisation?
Is the consumer in control? The site and its related marketing
communications should not alienate consumers through over-intrusion.
However, it is necessary to encourage them to visit the site when
they wish to.