Maintaining
brand health
Brands exist
for the long-term. They establish trust in consumers minds.
They are a companys most valuable assets and they should
be treated very carefully. Every change to the logo design should
be viewed in terms of its long-term impact on consumers. A well-managed
brand will still be there long after its guardians
have moved on.
Through the
Loop has been analysing a number of brands as part of its Brand
Positive programme. This programme has been established
to identify branding best practices. One of the issues that has
emerged from Brand Positive is the way in which companies
approach brand extension. This is certainly a way in which the
logo design can be made much
stronger but it also has the potential to dilute the brand equity
or cannibalise sales of the parent brand. Too much brand extension
that we see nowadays could be viewed as indicative of poor brand
practice. Clearly brand extension is an area that has to be approached
with a degree of caution. The maintenance of long-term brand health
is of paramount importance and should never be sacrificed for
short-term advantage when there is pressure to deliver.
One of the
ways in which this may be achieved is to analyse the reasons why
brands are extended. Sometimes brands are extended for the wrong
reasons such as technology enabling new forms of product delivery
or simply to create a story for the trade or press. A successful
brand extension will address genuine consumer needs and should
be developed from the consumer demand side not the supply side.
Developments such as technology should enable consumer needs to
be fulfilled rather than simply trying to sell a new product into
the market. What will be the long-term effects of a brand extension?
Effective
brand extension strengthens the brand franchise
Brand extensions
should be able to take the existing logo design and make it stronger.
This could be through addressing additional consumer opportunities
or finding new uses. Bringing new users to the brand is one of
the benefits of brand extension but it is important that existing
consumers are not disenfranchised by the extension. For example,
an analgesic may offer new delivery formats such as effervescent
which could appeal to those who find tablets difficult to swallow.
Equally, self-dissolving tablets such as Nurofen Meltlets offer
new usage occasions as they can be taken without water and are,
therefore, more portable. Such developments act to strengthen
the main brand by addressing new usage occasions.
Unilevers
decision to reposition its Lynx brand as a male grooming range
rather than just a deodorant has several advantages for the company.
Firstly, it enables Unilever to target the whole of the male grooming
regime, not just deodorants and not just toiletry products but
also the service area. The logo
design has also been used to market a chain of modern barber
shops. Secondly, it allows Unilever to look for sources of higher
profit. This comes at a time when the company is experiencing
pressure on its margins in the traditional retail business. The
development of added-value services is one way in which this can
be addressed. More recently, Unilever has extended its myhome
domestic cleaning service into dry cleaning through a London retail
outlet.
Boots has
been faced with greater competition in its core business of selling
health and beauty products by supermarkets. However, Boots has
a major advantage over its competitors through a high level of
consumer trust. This has allowed it to refocus its business from
retailing cosmetics, toiletries and pharmaceuticals to a provider
of healthcare and well-being services. This strengthens the logo
design through building on the element of trust and authority
within the healthcare sector and enables it to address additional
market segments more effectively. However, if the brand were to
be moved outside the health and well-being sector, it may be seen
to have lost focus and relevancy. Nevertheless, Boots recent decision
to close its mens stores shows that trust and strong brand
equity may not be sufficient if there is too little consumer demand.
Is there a market in the gap?
The brand
extension can be one way in which the logo design is kept modern
and alive. Nescafé is an example of a strong parent brand
that has used brand extension to develop a series of variants
that are able to target different coffee drinking occasions, consumer
types and price sectors. In turn these are able to strengthen
the Nescafé parent brand. The addition of a service or
experiential element such as Café Nescafé can also
strengthen the brand by moving it beyond mere imagery to the provision
of genuine consumer engagement. Nescafé can thus be equally
an established and modern, up-to-date logo
design.
The reverse
effect- dilution
One of the
principal dangers of brand extension is that the parent brand
equity may be diluted. If there is a misunderstanding of consumers
perception of the brand, it could be moved into a sector that
consumers view as inappropriate. Quite often the parent
brand will have been available for some time, enabling it to build
a level of equity and trust with consumers. It will have strong
credentials. Over time, its marketing has sought to build and
secure these credentials within its target market. An irrelevant
positioning has the ability to undermine the parents credentials.
A different
scenario is that the extension takes necessary marketing funds
from the parent. An example here could be moving a logo design
into a different sector that requires substantial marketing investment
to become established. If this means that the parent brand receives
less support, then it may be undermined.
Problem solvers-
avoiding the dilution effect
The extension
should be into a sector or create a sector that is a natural fit
with the parent brand. The exception to this is where the parent
brand is able to span multiple categories as it is a logo design
based on consumer values and imagery rather than being tied to
a product or service category. An example here is Virgin, which
can be transferred to new and seemingly unrelated sectors as it
is not related directly to one sector but has values that can
transcend a number of different categories. By the same token,
Nescafé is a strong brand as it is retained within the
overall coffee market but develops added-value sectors such as
espresso and cappuccino or premium lines.
Marketing
promotion for the brand extension should not be too removed from
that of their parent brand. The extension needs to feed off the
parent and take in its equity rather than having a significantly
different positioning. British Airways product offers such as
Club World and Club Europe feed off the core brand and add to
it. The Financial Times development of the FT.Com and FT
Mobile brands allows the extensions to feed off its media strength.
Creating a
category
This may be
one of the ways in which brand extension can be successful. A
brand that is moved into an existing product or service category
may end up as a me-too unless it is able to achieve significant
differentiation from the competitors. The new variant must be
able to promise something different such as simplicity or sustained
added value compared with existing brands in the sector. Mars
move into ice cream redefined the overall confectionery market
and created the ice cream countline. Similarly Nokias development
of a fashion element within the mobile phone sector moves the
brand into a potentially lucrative area.
Implications
Brand extension
has the ability to strengthen and update a brand through addressing
new consumer opportunities. However, it is not an easy option
that will add incremental sales to a brand. It has considerable
potential to undermine the brands equity if mismanaged.
Brand extension
does represent a way in which a brand can be kept up-to-date.
It may also help to increase sales through attracting new groups
of consumers or addressing additional usage occasions. A new line
has to justify its place on the retailers shelf and in the
brand portfolio with a clear role. If this is unclear, there is
a real danger that the parent brand equity will be undermined.
One of the
ways in which brand extension may be successful is through viewing
it from a consumer perspective. Do consumers view the brand as
being a specific product or service or is it a logo
design that can travel, i.e. its values could be applied to
a new sector? It is through developing this consumer understanding
that the true meaning of the logo design can be understood and
appropriate line extensions identified.
Action points
Evaluate the
long-term as well as short-term impact of a brand extension. What
does it add to the parent logo design?
Identify and evaluate the brand equity from a consumer perspective.
Is the brand identified with a product or service category?
Does the brand have potential to cross category borders? Again
this should be viewed from a consumer not marketer perspective.
Identify what the extension adds to the parent brand.
Brand extension should be relevant to the consumer and to the
parent brand.